Posted by asicsning
If done 360 Shangqie difficult to determine the legal , judicial decisions need to be made to the court finds it, and Tencent bullying behavior of the user to make a choice , the legal level is relatively simpler. As we all know , home is a consumer right to choose proper natural rights, and the right for the Consumer Protection Law Article IX clearly defined. Tencent as a user , regardless of whether their use is free software QQ , QQ as a product provider should fulfill the basic responsibility of the consumer , that is, the need to preserve the interests of consumers , but it is clear that Tencent did not respect the consumer person 's right to choose , but rather one with an obvious form contract terms of color to the user choice: either uninstall 360 , otherwise you can not use QQ. Obviously, this is a threat , a threat is a real violation of consumer rights thing. For consumers , the right to choose to provide goods or services to operators to choose varieties of goods or a service , independent of any decision to buy or not to buy a commodity , to accept or not to accept any one service . Such a right , is not entitled to deprive of Tencent . Moreover, taking into account the number of paying users Tencent's user belongs to , Tencent with such barbaric acts rude of me to force users to disable the QQ , then also contrary to the basic contractual obligations . And we all know , Tencent dared to threaten the nature of such an obvious choice to the user , is by virtue of its industry leader position for Tencent , its monopoly position in the industry naturally indisputable , its QQ software 6 million users is proof , this is no one to shake advantage. In this case , Tencent QQ requires the user to choose between 360 and , obviously is an abuse of dominant market position , suspected breaches of antitrust article 17 There is no justification for refusing counterparty transactions ; without justification , limited only counterparties with whom transactions or their designated operators can only be traded ; no justification for tying products , or transaction attach other unreasonable trading conditions . other three specific terms . http://www.hrsolutions-plus.co.uk/node/97/
Posted: 4:53 am, September 28th, 2013 in New York City
0 Comments | RSS comments feed for this topic
No tags yet.
You must log in to post.
Home | Forums | About | Contact | Advertise | RSS Feeds
Powered by bbPress and WordPress MU | © 2016 Midtown Lunch