<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maharaja (aka Hurry &amp; Tasty Curry)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midtownlunch.com/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midtownlunch.com/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/</link>
	<description>Food Adventures for Your Urban Lunch Hour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:54:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: whitesoxfan</title>
		<link>http://midtownlunch.com/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-219287</link>
		<dc:creator>whitesoxfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zandjnews.com/blog/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/#comment-219287</guid>
		<description>This article is outdated, so I will provide an update. Maharaja is awful. Samosas were somewhat soggy and quite bland. Lamb vindaloo was also relatively bland (hard for vindaloo) and had several pieces of goat, which was irritating b/c goat is so boany. Vegetables were standard, and naan was standard. Joy is much better. Also, Maharaja is expensive for the quality - $10.25 for a below average lunch. If you want something nice, go to Bukhara, if you want cheap go to Joy, but Maharaja is not cheap and bland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is outdated, so I will provide an update. Maharaja is awful. Samosas were somewhat soggy and quite bland. Lamb vindaloo was also relatively bland (hard for vindaloo) and had several pieces of goat, which was irritating b/c goat is so boany. Vegetables were standard, and naan was standard. Joy is much better. Also, Maharaja is expensive for the quality &#8211; $10.25 for a below average lunch. If you want something nice, go to Bukhara, if you want cheap go to Joy, but Maharaja is not cheap and bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://midtownlunch.com/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zandjnews.com/blog/2006/09/19/maharaja-aka-hurry-tasty-curry-2/#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>Zach - Great to see your review of Hurry &amp; Tasty / Maharajah. I&#039;ve had the saag twice pre-e.coli and don&#039;t recall it being watery. different strokes ... or my standards have slipped?  Too bad they don&#039;t do a buffet. Will have to try Rangole some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach &#8211; Great to see your review of Hurry &amp; Tasty / Maharajah. I&#8217;ve had the saag twice pre-e.coli and don&#8217;t recall it being watery. different strokes &#8230; or my standards have slipped?  Too bad they don&#8217;t do a buffet. Will have to try Rangole some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

